It is Episode 2! Kill some time and let us tickle your ear pussies!! Get hyped, share this shit with everyone! Make this podcast huge!
Tales of Relevant Thought: Episode 22
"No More MMO Questions"
Review: Back to the Future The Game
Don't need no credit card to ride this train...but maybe to buy the game
5 Reasons 2 Hate: Cyclops
One whiny boy scout fresh for the slaughter
Tales of Relevant Thought: Episode 21
"Wet Dream"
Review: Tomb Raider
Tomb Raider is reinvented as well as my hatred for modern day games
Tales of Relevant Thought: Episode 20
"We Made More Than Three"
Review: Evoland
My PC adventure has begun and here is one of the first games that stands out
Tales of Relevant Thought: Episode 19
"Vertigo Asshole"
Review: X-Men Legends 2: Rise of Apocalaypse
Just work past the rage and you'll see my true thoughts of this game
Friday, November 30, 2012
Tales of Relevant Thought - Episode 2
It is Episode 2! Kill some time and let us tickle your ear pussies!! Get hyped, share this shit with everyone! Make this podcast huge!
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Sunday, November 18, 2012
FREEplays - Episode 1
FREEplays is a new video gaming series
featuring two good friends that like to play games(real original,
right?) Watch as Tom Badguy and Scorpius Jones banter, comment and
play some games. So watch, comment and enjoy some classic games and
analysis! This is just another great feature I have a strong feeling about to the site!
This is something we have always wanted to do(seriously, we talked about it for YEARS and now it is happening). Spread the word on YouTube, Twitter, everything! Lets everyone know about FREEplays!!
Check out the FREEplaysYouTube Channel and Subscribe now!!
Labels:
FREEplays
Friday, November 16, 2012
Tales of Relevant Thought - Pilot Episode
It is here! The Pilot Episode for the Podcast, "Tales of Relevant Thought." We've been waiting a long time to get this together and be made and our first episode is completed! If you follow me on twitter, you probably saw the pics I posted and all the hype surrounding this! We want this to be BIG! I mean SUPER BIG. We feel like we got something really hot right here and we want it to spread across all the interwebs. Currently, there is no schedule set up as of yet for the release of the episodes, nor will this start to be a weekly thing(mainly because I will be out of town on vacation next week). But we want some buzz for this.
Ok, seriously, I know how it goes sometimes. You see a Podcast on the Internet and want to listen to it, but you don't have the time. This is an hour long show; who has the time? But do me this favor. Find that one project you've wanted to work on; something that takes some time. While you're doing it, throw this on in the background and enjoy. I personally feel this is going to be something amazing and it must be exposed to as many listeners as possible. For more information regarding this new Podcast, check out the link near the top of the site.
So, listen! Comment!! Tweet it!!! Show us some love and help get this show heard!!!!
Without further ado, EPISODE 1(Click to listen/download):
Additional Credits/Notes:
Intro/Outro Beats mixed by: Scorpius Jones
Special Thanks to: Our friend Nate, @kurodensetsu, for the hosting!
* At the end of this episode, we say that these will be posted on YouTube. This recorded before we got hosting.
Thursday, November 15, 2012
MS Paint Nintendo Art #3
![]() |
| Ashtar has to deal with a lot of bullshit |
![]() |
| What Star Wars thinks of their new ownership |
![]() |
| Batman effects everything |
![]() |
| Click to expand |
Labels:
DC Comics,
MS Paint,
star wars,
video games
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
MS Paint Nintendo Art #2
Here are some more MS Paint NES stuff I made.
![]() |
| Bad guys need a stage select too |
![]() |
| Some have it easier than others |
![]() |
| A real Final Fantasy |
Labels:
star wars,
video games
Monday, November 12, 2012
ND Football 2012: Week 11
So, the Irish didn't fall behind
Saturday night in their victory against the Golden Eagles of Boston
College. In fact, it was a pretty dominating defensive performance
against a BC team that through everything including the kitchen sink
at ND. Notre Dame improves to 10-0 on the season and has pretty much
solidified itself in a BCS bowl game. The Irish haven't had a 10 win
season since 2006. The win over BC makes it four straight times the
Irish have beaten the Eagles(no 1993 or 2002 upset this time). Lets
take a look at ND's recent victory.
The offense made a great correction
this week: score touchdowns. Against Pitt, the Irish struggled to get
in the redzone. It was a different story this time. Long, double
digit play scoring drives was the story of this game for the Irish.
They ran the ball effectively, Everrett Golson threw really well(2 TD
passes, 1 TD run, 0 INT), accounting for all of ND's touchdowns. ND
led 14-3 at the half on having 3 drives in the first half, all time
consuming. You can pretty much gather how this ND team wants to play.
Methodical drives, that keeps the opposing offense off the field,
while running the ball. The second half was a little, hmm, odd. ND
scored on their opening drive making it 21-3. But two fumbles stopped
other drives. ND then started to play like the game was over in the
middle of the third quarter. At first, I was really upset because I
wanted them to pile on the score to help in the rankings. But after
giving it some thought, I think Brian Kelly didn't want the team to
self destruct or beat themselves. The two turnovers did not make him
happy so he wanted to secure the win and eliminate the possibility of
shooting themselves in the foot. Whatever works. A win is a win.
Unfortunately in this game, freshman wider receiver DaVaris Daniels
injured himself in an attempt to catch a touchdown pass and he is out
for the rest of the season.
![]() |
| Tyler Eifert high pointing the ball |
The defense crushed it, holding BC to
just 53 yards rushing in the game. They did not allow a touchdown and
forced the Eagles to kick 2 field goals. In the first half, BC used
every play they could think of to try to gain an inch on the Irish D.
Screen plays, reverses, gimmicks, tricks, shenanigans, whatever you
want to call it, they tried it. The BC offense had some success, but
the Irish D beared down and held, forcing two turnovers(including
Manti Te'o's sixth INT of the year, witch ties for first in the FBS)
and five sacks. Prince Shembo and Stephone Tuitt played great, both
recording sacks. Bennett Jackson had a great game defending in the
secondary almost coming away with a pick six. The only annoying thing
I noticed was on third and long, BC would convert on a pass over the
middle because ND would be playing zone defense. This is something I
hope they clean up for the last two games of the season. The defense
played discipline and eventually, wore down the Eagles offensive
front creating more and more pressure as the game went on, just like
they have done all season. A great team victory for the Irish.
![]() |
| ND's Defense racked up 5 sacks |
10-0 feels great. ND next has Wake
Forest in their final home game of the season. Senior Day. ND has
struggled at home. I'm hoping this will not be the case, but it
doesn't really matter to me just as long as they win. Expect the
Irish to play more explosively and for the seniors to play out of
their minds. It's kind of sad to think that next week will be Manti
Te'o's last game at Notre Dame stadium. He has had a great season and
will be playing on Sundays next season. The Irish just need to do
what they have done all year and that is focus on one game at a time.
Get it done against Wake and then close the season at USC. This has
been a special season. A special team. I am enjoying the ride and
will be happy no matter where it takes them. Until then,
Go, Irish! Beat Wake!!
Labels:
article,
nd football,
sports
Thursday, November 8, 2012
Review: Collateral
In my experience and frequent
conversations discussing movies and actors, I always notice that when
Tom Cruise is brought, you have to be careful with what you say. It
feels like you will be castrated if you say he was a good actor in
something that is not The Last Samurai. Hating on Cruise seems to be
the “in” thing now. I mean, I can see why. He's not really the
best actor and his personal life is some crazy train of oddities and
WTF moments. I haven't seen every Tom Cruise movie but Collateral is
one I think is safe to put as a movie he was good in.
Collateral was directed by Michael
Mann, the director that made Heat in '95...and sadly the same guy
that made the 2006 film, Miami Vice. So, he's hit and miss as far as
I can see. Along with Tom Cruise, Jamie Foxx is also in this movie,
as Max the cab driver. Foxx is ok in this, no where near his
performances I enjoyed in Jarhead or The Soloist. Max is a
respectable cabby that takes pride in his work. He works his ass off
to save money so he can open his own company. The beginning of the
movie displays how he is a smart and knowledgeable person, which I
guess is to show that he's not the average cab driver...but then at
the same time, kind of making it seem like cab drivers are typically
unintelligent people. I'm surprised they didn't make him foreign.
![]() |
| Max, our cab driving protagonist |
After dropping off an attorney named
Annie, played by Jada Pinkett Smith(I think she's fuckin' hot; a damn
sexy lady if you ask me...um, I digress), Max's next customer is Tom
Cruise's character, Vincent. Vincent hires Max for the night to make
5 stops and then back to the airport, convincing the unsuspecting
cabby with a pile of cash. Max agrees and takes Vincent to his first
stop. Which then leads to a guy falling from the building onto his
cab a few minutes later. We find out that Vincent is a hired gun and
his five stops are actually five hits. The hitman holds Max hostage
and makes him drive around the streets of LA. The only question on
Max's mind is, when will the gun be turned on him.
![]() |
| Vincent |
This is a suspense/thriller that
delivers...and then not delivers. For example, there are several
scenes in the movie where Vincent and Max spitball philosophical
banter while dealing with the intense situation of killing people.
But then there's several parts where Max seems very whiny and just
doesn't stop bitching. Like I said before, Jamie Foxx's acting is
just average. It's not like you watched it and said that, “Only
Jamie Foxx can play that character.”
One thing I really like is how a lot of
the movie is just shot in the cab. It makes the viewer really pay
attention to both characters and how their “relationship”
evolves. Especially when you are trying to figure out Vincent. You
know he's a cold blood killer, but at the same time, he treats Max
with a lot of respect and even saves his job in the film. He seems
very realistic and clear headed for a guy paid to waste folks. This
character has several layers and at some points, extremely positive
scenes, that it almost literally makes you forget that he shot a jazz
club owner twice in the heart and once in the head. And this is made
believable because Tom Cruise did a really good job in this movie.
He's convincing. He makes you feel for the character and the
character is supposed to be the bad guy. Best part is, this isn't
really a Cruise like role. I think that's what I like most about it.
I don't think of Tom Cruise as a contract killer with a heart of
gold. Who could really pull that off to begin with?
![]() |
| Tom Cruise did a good job in this film |
As for the movie as a whole, I like it,
but not by a lot. If Tom Cruise didn't do such a good job, I probably
would have fallen asleep during it. Several times during the movie
when Max is in stressful situations and you're supposed to feel the
suspense, I didn't really care. I just wanted to see more Vincent. I
don't like how I didn't care too much about the main character. Kind
of ruins a big part of the film. I probably would have liked it more
if Jada had a nude scene...relevance? None. I just want to see it. If
you're interested in seeing a movie that Tom Cruise is pretty good
in, then I would check this out. If your hatred for him is too grand
and you would rather eat your own vomit then watch Tom Cruise, then
avoid this one.
![]() |
| J-J-J-Jada! |
Wednesday, November 7, 2012
5 Reasons 2 Hate: 3D Fighters
1. I hate pressing a button to block.
Ok, fuck this. Pressing a button to
block is pretty much the number one reason why 3D fighters are broken
and a painful experience for me. HOLDING BACK IS THE BEST WAY TO
BLOCK. Having to hit a button to guard seems primitive to me. It's
SOOOO much easier to press back on the stick. A designated button is
just distracting, unnecessary, a giant fucking waste of time. If I'm
playing a fighting game, I need quick reactions, a solid way of doing
things that I can fall back on. NOT MORE BUTTON PRESSES. I played
Mortal Kombat and Street Fighter at the same time on the SNES back in
the day. I got blocking in SF easy, in MK, I never got blocking(and
MK was 2D back then, for those that are born after 2000). An
additional button press to defend yourself is too much to think
about. It's hard to have fast reactions when you have something in
your mind saying you have to hit a button when someone is attacking
you. In the fighting game world, that makes no sense to me. My
opponent is furiously mashing buttons to deal damage and my way of
dealing with it is to hit another button? NO. THIS IS WRONG. The
muscle memory that needs to be built while playing a fighting is to
NOT press buttons while being attacked. 3D fighters take that and
throw it out the window. And this is just an addition to another
problem...
2. The controls are ass.
Yes, they are. They are complete ASS. I
don't want to hear this shit that, “Oh, you get used to it if you
play them enough.” Fuck that bullshit. There's one way a fighting
game should be made: 2D, hold back to block, and easy to remember
commands and controls. None of this sidestepping garbage; none of
this “guard impact” crap; just a simple use of controls that you
can build a muscle memory for so you can focus more on outplaying and
outsmarting your opponent. I hate the sidesteps. I hate the low, mid,
high attacking. I even hate the jumps(which always seem useless). It
never feels comfortable. It never feels legit(meaning, I don't feel
like I'm playing a fighting game). There is no flow in these games
and it's because the controls don't serve as the best format for a
fighting game. I mean, lets get down to it, some of these fucking
games don't even have a 6-button layout. How? How do you not have 6
buttons to use? What's with this 5-button shit(god damn block
button!)? To give it credit, you need skill to play this. Not to be
the best player, but try to fucking not break your mind while playing
with something so fucking broken. The idea should be to find ways to
beat people you play, not be handicapped by controls that make no
damn sense. There's a reason why 3D fighters are not as celebrated as
the 2D ones. Think about it.
3. They just don't look as cool.
Mainly on gameplay. Special moves don't
look really cool, combos you pull off look like the same repetitive
forward punch you are using; it just doesn't look very creative.
Watching someone pull off a combo in Marvel Vs Capcom, pulling off an
FADC into Ultra on Street Fighter; THOSE are amazing spectacles to
watch. 3D fighters like Tekken have dull looking combos. I mean, the
character designs in my opinions aren't really displayed well because
of the 3D look. People, these are VIDEO GAMES. I don't want them to
be realistic, I want them to be creative and filled with fantasy. I
don't want them to look like real people; I see real people every
day. Use some imagination. I mean, the only game closest to this is
Soul Calibur, so at least one of these games has SOMETHING going for
it. Either then that, it's a snooze fest of visuals. It's hard to
take 3D fighting games seriously when you're snoring. How fascinating
is hit to see someone constantly jabbing someone while they're stuck
in the fucking air...which reminds me...
4. Corner juggles...
Probably the most ridiculous fucking
thing I have seen in a fighting game. You all know what I'm talking
about. Even fans of 3D series hate this shit. It is annoying and in
some games, is the cornerstone of winning and being a great player.
Basically, you start a combo and if they are popped up, you hit just
the tiniest pixel to keep the combo going while the opponent floats
like a jerk in the air. It is the most FUCKING RIDICULOUS thing I
have EVER seen in a fighting game. How is this a strategy? It's
soooooo stupid. Imagine if you were fighting someone, punched them in
the fast and sent them towards the ground. Then, right before they
hit the ground, you throw a punch STRAIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU AND IT
HITS THEM. Does that make any fucking sense? FUCK NO IT DOESN'T.
Don't believe me? YouTube this shit. See these combos of fighters
swinging at air and someone how juggling and comboing an opponent.
Go. Enlighten your fucking self.
5. Just the way they are played.
Beyond the terrible controls and the
fucked up corner juggles, the way the game is played just boggles my
mind. It's not a usual chess match that you would expect where you
have to play mind games with your opponents. Nope. 3D fighters can't
be that fun. Instead, it's set up as if you're taking turns. One
person attacks. Then the next person attacks. Then the other person
attacks again. So on and so forth. BORING. I can never identify any
setups in these games. It's just hit buttons and pray they're not
blocking. It seems super slow. Too many matches I have watched that
just timed out because everyone plays sooooo lame. These games are
just go in there and see what happens. Now, I'm sure there is some
strategy but I guarantee that it has too many limits and are not as
expansive as a 2D fighter. These games just seem like you are playing
against the game, not the opponent. Too limited, in my opinion. They
are just flat our boring and lame as shit. It boggles my mind how
people can like Tekken. I will give a saving grace to Soul Cal
because at least a lot of the moves and displays has some flare to
it, but I can't put it up there with MvC or SF. Doesn't even come
close. Someone needs to do something new with a 3D fighter or it will
never compete with the big boys. Right now, it doesn't even deserve
to be in the same conversation.
Labels:
5 Reasons 2 Hate,
article,
video games
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Review: The Birdcage
I don't know if liking this movie
questions my manhood, my sexuality, or anything, but I really like
this movie. I find it hilarious and well acted. The Birdcage was
directed by Mike Nichols, the same guy that directed other movies I
like: Biloxi Blues(1988), Primary Colors(1998) and Charlie Wilson's
War(2007). Now, the Birdcage is out there compared to those movies.
It is actually a remake of the 1978 French film La Cage Aux Folles.
Robin Williams and Nathan Lane play a gay couple that owns a club in
South Beach, Florida. The club features drag queen shows and Nathan
Lane's character, Albert, is their biggest star, Starina. Their son,
Val, played by Dan Futterman, who was in...nothing else I really give
a shit about, is getting married to the daughter of a U.S. Senator
played by Gene Hackman. And yes, I am a straight man that likes this
movie. Deal with it.
With Val marrying Barbara, played by
Calista Flockhart(by the looks of her, this is pre-skeleton form), is
an uncomfortable situation for Armand(Williams' character) because
Val is so young, he gives his blessing. But there is a catch. The
Senator is a Republican conservative and you pretty much get an idea
on his views of homosexuality are. Val and Barbara lie to the Senator
and his wife, played by Dianne Wiest, and mention nothing about Val's
gay parents. So, Val asks his father to “play it straight” if you
will, so Val can marry the girl he loves without any issues from
Barbara's asshole parents.
![]() |
| Robin Williams and Nathan Lane are great in this movie |
This movie is filled with great humor
that is really hard not to laugh at and enjoy. And hands down, Nathan
Lane steals the show. His role as the very feminine and sensitive gay
male is entertaining, funny and memorable. There is a great scene
where Albert and Armand are practicing being straight men and Armand
has to keep slapping Albert's hand, because every time he drank from
something, his pinky was up. They use John Wayne as an example to be
a straight man and start walking, talking and mimicking him. Of
course, it doesn't work very well, with Albert's high emotions
running and Armand's stress of the situation. Robin Williams and
Nathan Lane are great together. They sell what they are doing and you
believe it. Plus, their comedy mixed with one another is something
that should be absorbed by all.
You can imagine all the awkwardness in
this film with the characters trying to convince other characters
their not gay, Albert and Armand listening to the Senator's views on
abortion, gays in the military; all the humor in these scenes are
sold on wonderful reactions, body language and the occasional Albert
outburst. I pretty much giggle through out this entire movie. The
setups are brilliant, the writing is funny, and the acting is
outstanding. Literally, it is hard to not enjoy this movie. I mean,
Nathan Lane in drag posing as Val's mother was one of the funniest
things I have ever seen.
![]() |
| Nathan Lane is definitely the star in this film |
It is also important to mention the
absolutely FUCKING HILARIOUS part of the house keeper, Abador, played
by Hank Azaria(the great vocal talent from The Simpsons). His role
and performance had be laughing my ass off. He plays kind of the over
the top stereotypical gay man; epic slur, over the top gestures, etc.
And it is damn funny. So much of what he does clicks with the
interactions with the other characters. Hank Azaria is just a funny
guy and plays the role of a funny, exaggerated, foreigner, gay or
straight, to perfection.
![]() |
| Hank Azaria |
There is also a very memorable scene of
Gene Hackman in drag. I was actually surprised that he did that. It
speaks volumes to an already amazing actor. And you know what, it was
hilarious. Clever writing mixed with the great comedic actors of
Nathan Lane, Robin Williams and Hank Azaria make this film a fun
experience. But once again, Nathan Lane is awesome in this movie. If
you are not a Nathan Lane fan, this film will make you one. Known for
being a great Broadway actor, Lane shows why.
![]() |
| Hackman in drag. Classic. |
This is a good movie. It is well
written, well directed, well acted; it is really hard to not enjoy
this film. I wanted to write about it because I don't really hear
anyone talking about it. I think it's a movie that needs more
recognition and more attention. A great comedy with great actors.
Some may be uncomfortable because of the theme and/or setting(I'm
talking to the manly men now), but just give it a chance. You'll
laugh so hard you will forget why you had to act like a douche bag
about seeing it. So put your steroid needles down and go watch this
movie if you haven't. Or just come out already. Good things are good
things no matter if it's straight, homosexual, whatever.
I highly recommend this film if you are
in the mood for laughs and good acting. I'm definitely going to start
bringing it up more to my friends to give it more recognition and
make them watch it if they haven't and you all should do the same.
Monday, November 5, 2012
ND Football 2012: Week 10
So, they tried to lose. Holy fuck, they
tried to lose. But despite their poor efforts, ND won and got to 9-0
for the first time since 1993. Saturday's game was a heart
attack(yet, another one this season). The Irish came back from being
down 14 in the fourth quarter to tie and then had to pull it out in
three overtimes. Not really what Irish faithful were expecting, but a
win is a win. Just want to point out something before I get into
this: Why is it that ND is just struggling at home? Seriously. All
ND's home games have been decided by 7 points or less. Yet, on the
road, they seem to thrive...? Not really sure what is going on, but
as long as they keep winning, I won't complain too much.
Starting with the defense; da FUCK
happened?! They were missing tackles, not stopping the run; seemed a
little lazy and unprepared. At least, until the final quarter and OT
when they played like the Irish defense we know and love. Basically
going from sub-par in quarters 1-3, back to the dominance at the end.
Hopefully, this game serves as a wake up call that all teams that the
Irish play are going to play the best they will ever play this year.
The defense did sack senior Pitt QB Tino Sunseri 5 times. Pretty much
at the end of the game, Sunseri looked lost and had no idea what to
do when the Irish D FINALLY stepped it up. He was throwing bad passes
and just taking sacks. The Pitt offense was pretty much non-existent
at the end of the game. This is probably the first time the defense
was not on their A-game all year. These things happen. And because of
that, I will let this slide for this one game since ND got the W.
![]() |
| ND forced 5 sacks |
Going to the offense, what a winding
road this game was. Too many missed opportunities, too many
turnovers, too much inconsistency. The first two drives the Irish had
in the game were long, methodical drives that stalled out in the red
zone. Instead of two touchdowns, we had to settle for two field
goals. Then until the fourth quarter, they were doing nothing.
Everret Golson had a pretty good first half. No mistakes, good
judgment; didn't play poorly. Then Tommy Rees comes out and starts
the second half...and then throws an interception...I still have no
clue why Rees was out there. He's come in the help before, but I
didn't feel like Golson was playing bad at all, nor did I see a
reason to bench him. But of course, after Tommy's INT that led to a
Pitt score, Golson was back in. The Irish were down 20-6 going into
the fourth quarter. Then Golson hit TJ Jones for a TD pass early in
the quarter. But was then followed by a missed PAT from Kyle
Brindza(who also missed a FG in the game; guy seems to miss at least
one FG a game and now a PAT). Scored remained 20-12 until the Irish
drove down the field and Golson threw a pick in the endzone with
about 3+ minutes left. After getting the ball back, Golson threw a
huge pass to DaVaris Daniels which was then followed by another
Golson TD pass to Theo Riddick. Then came the two point conversion to
tie the game. Golson rolled out, saw nothing, and then ran it in to
tie the game 20-20. But the gray hairs did not stop growing yet.
There was still OT.
The Irish and Pitt exchange field goals
in the first overtime, making it 23-23. Then, the Irish drive down
but Cierre Wood fumbles in the endzone(making it 3 turnovers for the
Irish). Pitt then gets the ball, sets up for a game winning field
goal, and misses. The god damn luck of the Irish prevails. Following
this, Pitt gets another drive in the third OT, but settle for a FG.
Going into ND's possession, Pitt leads 26-23. This went away quickly,
as ND drove down to inside the one yard line thanks to the running
skills of freshman QB Everrett Golson(who got the game ball). Golson
then took the ball on a QB sneak and won the game for the Irish,
29-26.
![]() |
| Golson with the game winning TD |
Too close for comfort. I thought I was
going to puke my brains out after this game. ND has to play better,
but once again, I hope this serves as a good wake up call that will
get them through their final three games. Notre Dame is 9-0. Still
undefeated. Next up is a prime time match up at Boston College this
Saturday(6pm EST). ND is not playing at home so, based on this
season, should perform well. BC may not be a good team this year but
it is still BC. I guarantee, they will play their best football when
the Irish come calling. ND needs to stay the course and keep winning
games. The media and BCS aren't really favoring them that well, but
fuck it. Just one game at a time and just keep winning. That other
stuff should work it self out. Until then,
Go Irish! Beat Eagles!!
Labels:
article,
nd football,
sports
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















































